 |
|
|
|
Case History
-
Aug. 21, 1996 - The
Commonwealth Court ruled that SCRUB did indeed
have standing to challenge the granting of the
variance.
-
Dec. 7, 1995 - The court
determined that SCRUB 1) failed to make a record
below as to how its interests differed from the
common interests of all citizens in procuring
obedience to the law; 2) failed to show how it
might be harmed by a governmental decision to
grant relief from a special restriction on
outdoor advertising, as opposed to a general
ban; and 3) owned no property near the proposed
billboard.
-
Apr. 25, 1995 - Revere
filed a motion to quash SCRUB's appeal on the
grounds SCRUB had a lack of standing.
-
April 21, 1994 - On appeal,
the ZBA granted a variance allowing the erection
of a billboard within 660 feet of proposed
right-of-way lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
